DNA methyltransferases (MTases) that transfer a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine to either adenine or cytosine residues, are found in a wide variety of prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Methylation should be considered when digesting DNA with restriction endonucleases because cleavage can be blocked or impaired when a particular base in the recognition site is methylated.
In prokaryotes, MTases have most often been identified as elements of restriction/modification systems that act to protect host DNA from cleavage by the corresponding restriction endonuclease. Most laboratory strains of E. coli contain three site-specific DNA methylases.
- Dam methylase–methylation at the N6 position of the adenine in the sequence GATC (1,2).
- Dcm methyltransferases–methylation at the C5 position of the second cytosine in the sequences CCAGG and CCTGG (1,3).
- EcoKI methylase–methylation of adenine in the sequences AAC(N6)GTGC and GCAC(N6)GTT.
Some or all of the sites for a restriction endonuclease may be resistant to cleavage when isolated from strains expressing the Dam or Dcm methylases if the methylase recognition site overlaps the endonuclease recognition site. For example, plasmid DNA isolated from dam+ E. coli is completely resistant to cleavage by MboI, which cleaves at GATC sites.
Not all DNA isolated from E. coli is methylated to the same extent. While pBR322 DNA is fully modified (and is therefore completely resistant to MboI digestion), only about 50% of λ DNA Dam sites are methylated, presumably because the methylase does not have the opportunity to methylate the DNA fully before it is packaged into the phage head. As a result, enzymes blocked by Dam or Dcm modification will yield partial digestion patterns with λ DNA.
Restriction sites that are blocked by Dam or Dcm methylation can be un-methylated by cloning your DNA into a dam–, dcm– strain of E. coli, such as dam–/dcm– Competent E. coli (NEB #C2925).
Restriction sites can also be blocked if an overlapping site is present. In this case, part of the Dam or Dcm sequence is generated by the restriction enzyme sequence, followed by the flanking sequence. This situation should also be considered when designing restriction enzyme digests.
CpG MTases, found in higher eukaryotes (e.g., Dnmt1), transfer a methyl group to the C5 position of cytosine residues. Patterns of CpG methylation are heritable, tissue specific and correlate with gene expression. Consequently, CpG methylation has been postulated to play a role in differentiation and gene expression (4).
Note: The effects of CpG methylation are mainly a concern when digesting eukaryotic genomic DNA. CpG methylation patterns are not retained once the DNA is cloned into a bacterial host.
The table below summarizes methylation sensitivity for NEB restriction enzymes, indicating whether or not cleavage is blocked or impaired by Dam, Dcm or CpG methylation if or when it overlaps each recognition site. This table should be viewed as a guide to the behavior of the enzymes listed rather than an absolute indicator. Consult REBASE , the restriction enzyme database, for more detailed information and specific examples upon which these guidelines are based.
- Marinus, M.G. and Morris, N.R. (1973) J. Bacteriol. 114, 1143–1150. PMID: 4576399
- Geier, G.E.and Modrich, P. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 1408–1413. PMID: 368070
- May, M.S. and Hattman, S.(1975) J. Bacteriol. 123, 768–770. PMID: 1097428
- Siegfried, Z. and Cedar, H. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, r305–307. PMID: 9115385
|◼||Blocked||◇ ol||Impaired by Overlapping|
|◻ ol||Blocked by Overlapping||◇ scol||Impaired by Some Combinations of Overlapping|
|◻ scol||Blocked by Some Combinations of Overlapping|