Beginning March 20th FedEx will provide carrier services for all domestic shipments. There will be no changes to service levels or NEB's Packaging, Shipping, and Delivery Policy.
HomeFAQsWhat is the difference between the three ready-made libraries?
FAQ: What is the difference between the three ready-made libraries?
The linear Ph.D-7 and Ph.D-12 libraries will have binders to most targets. For those targets that do not work with the linear libraries, the disulfide looped Ph.D-C7C library may have binders to the target of interest. The Ph.D.-7 library consists of randomized linear 7-mer peptides and may be most useful for targets requiring binding elements concentrated in a short stretch of amino acids. The Ph.D.-12 library consists of randomized linear 12-mer peptides. These 12-mer peptides have a diversity equivalent to the Ph.D.-7 library but spread over more sequence space. A structurally constrained library such as the Ph.D.-C7C library are especially useful for targets whose native ligands are in the context of a surface loop, such as antibodies with structural epitopes. Additionally, imposing structural constraints on the unbound ligand may result in a less unfavorable binding entropy, improving the overall free energy of binding compared to unconstrained ligands (O’Neil, K.T. et al 1992 Proteins 14, 509-515). A major disadvantage of structurally constrained libraries is that the constraint may “freeze out” a conformation required for target binding, preventing binding outright rather than improving affinity (McConnell, S. J. et al 1994 Gene 151, 115-118). Regardless of the library, typically only 3-5 positions are critical for binding with a target.